Election 2016: Day #4 – Toastneck

duncan

Elections are like weddings. You never get problems from the areas you anticipate: eccentric aunt who gets into racial arguments? No problem, put a cousin on aunt-duty and sort that shit out but wait, unrelated, now you’ve run out of food. YOU DIDN’T SEE THAT COMING, DID YOU?

So too, when the Liberals put QandA in the boring but seemingly capable hands of Kelly O’Dwyer and Australian Industry Group’s Innes Willox, they didn’t expect some guy called Duncan Storrar to make the Liberal Budget look like Dickens’s Oliver Twist and for Duncan to get his own hashtag and a crowdfunding website raising him $45,000.

When the Liberals did a SWOT analysis, they did not put Duncan Storrar on it. They didn’t even put, “some Aussie Battler who exposes Liberals for being out of touch.” Similarly, they did not see it as a clear and present danger that on day four of the campaign, the nation could consider the Coalition’s focus on the accelerated delivery of grilled bread at breakfast time to be a bit of a problem.

If you missed the exchange on QandA last night, you can view it here but if you can’t be bothered, I’ll paraphrase:

Duncan the Aussie battler: Why do rich people get a tax free threshold lift and I, as a poor person, don’t? If you lifted my threshold I could take my daughters to the movies but rich people don’t even notice when you lift theirs.

Kelly O’Dwyer: We have lifted the threshold for 500,000 people who are in the top bracket. You’re not one of them.

Adam Bandt: That doesn’t sound fair. People are great.

Innes Willox from the Australian Industry Group: Duncan, you so poor you not paying much tax anyway so shut up, Povvo!

Duncan: I pay tax every time I go to the supermarket and every time I fill up the car with petrol.

QandA Audience: Huzzah!

Innes Willox: So does everyone else. Not everyone wins out of every budget. That’s not how things work. Companies pay a lot of tax. Did you even for once in your poor, economically unhelpful life consider them?

Kelly O’Dwyer: One of the café owners I spoke to the other day has got a turnover of just over $2 million, as a result of our tax cut on the first of July this year, he will have access to the instant asset write off which means he can invest in his business, a $6,000 toaster, which means he can get more customers through his business, on a Saturday when there’s a bottleneck, more customers through his business, because toast is that bottleneck that he needs to clear in order to get more people in, he’s going to derive more revenue and he’s told me he’s going to put more people on.

So many thoughts on this.

  1. Is it a bottleneck, or a toastneck? Should we be using toastneck now? I feel like that could become a thing if we really tried. I resisted Toastgate because it’s too easy. Somethinggate is too hackneyed. We have to lift people. This is an Ideas Boom.
  2. We all felt a bit sceptical of the Idea Boom but would we have been as sceptical if it had been explained that it was a toast boom?  I think we’d all be fairly relieved and stop wondering what the Plan for a New Economy is, if we’re assured that it is predominantly centred around toast. People do like toast; the Liberals need to own this and move on.
  3. Where has the Productivity Commission been on toast all this time? All we’ve heard are shrieks of silence. Lurking in cafés across the nation, people were waiting for toast, grinding our economy to a halt and the Commission sat idle. Did you know that in 1904, there was a Royal Commission into the Butter Industry? So they’ve had fair warning this toast thing was coming.
  4. The Sydney Morning Herald, in a brilliant piece of investigatory journalism, has located the $6,000 toaster. (Actually the toaster nominated by the SMH is $6,685.82 & FREE Shipping which provides one the invidious choice of believing the Sydney Morning Herald doesn’t know the difference between $6,685.82 and $6,000 or that Kelly O’Dwyer doesn’t. Which to choose? Stressful.) No one has yet located the café though and that is a great follow up story.
  5. O’Dwyer’s story seems illogical. If the Star (DT14) – 1000 Slice/Hr Double Conveyor Toaster is so efficient (and get across this: it can toast 1,000 slices per half hour) why would the café owner need more staff? Surely they’d need less because the relentless grind of making toast has now been lifted off some miserable human hands and put into the whirring gears of a machine. Even if people are eating two slices each, you’re going to hit some pretty significant floorspace issues with that much toast being provided to customers – I guess there will be additional waitstaff to deliver that huge bounty of toast to customers but where is this airport hangar sized café that is leading the Toast Boom and when will it IPO?

In other news, Malcolm Turnbull had to suspend campaigning after Fiona Scott wouldn’t confirm she voted for him. This seems injudicious. Stay focused, Mal. You cannot melt down and go into freak out mode every time a local MP says they are not going to divulge that they didn’t vote for you in a secret ballot. Given that the numbers in the relevant ballot were 54 to 44, if this becomes a trend, this means there will be a lot of days taken out of the campaign with you sitting in a local electorate office/Comcar breathing into a paper bag and that’s just not productive. Harden up.

Shorten didn’t get off scott free with late breaking news that one of his candidates (in Fremantle) is going to be disendorsed because he assaulted a police officer and didn’t fess up about it. SO THAT IS AWKWARD.

 

ressigma15631com6069Election 2016: Day #4 – Toastneck
0 comments